Hosanna Church Cult and Coverup - Index
Since I've been getting so much traffic to the individual Hosanna Church articles, I decided to archive them all in one spot, and make them always accessible from the main page (the right sidebar).
I am always looking for personal insights into this case from Ponchatoula residents or anyone else with a connection to the alleged crimes. Please email me, and I will maintain strict anonymity if requested.
UPDATE: I hadn't seen this article from the Hammond Star, which is the first to describe the ritualistic aspects from a law enforcement official: Agents Graphically Describe Abuse (11/30/2007)
UPDATE: Guilty Verdict in Hosanna Church Rape Trial (Video, WWLTV)
UPDATE: Hosanna Jury Likely to Get Case (Dec. 3, 2007) (2theadvocate)
UPDATE: Witness: Bernard Would 'Confess': Ex-Churchmember Says He Also Recanted (Dec. 1, 2007) (2theadvocate)
UPDATES: Detectives Pray, Quote Scripture During Hosanna Case Interrogations (Nov. 30, 2007) (2theadvocate); Witnesses Deny Abuse at Hosanna Church (Dec. 2, 2007) (2theadvocate)
UPDATE: FBI Agent Testifies in Hosanna Trial (Nov. 29, 2007) (2theadvocate)
UPDATE: Child's Nightmares Launched Case (Nov. 29, 2007) (2theadvocate)
UPDATE: First Witness in Hosanna Church Case to Take the Stand (Nov. 28, 2007) (2theadvocate.com)
UPDATE: Jury Selection in Austin "Trey" Bernard's trial
Jury Selection Starts for Church Member Accused of Child Rape (KATC3)
UPDATE: August 15, 2007
Defense: Witnesses Recant (2theadvocate.com)
UPDATE: May 10, 2007
Attorney Gets Copy of Hosanna Suspect's Confession (2theadvocate.com)
UPDATE: December 23, 2006
I know some of my sources have spoken about shady dealings in regards to the church property. As always, feel free to contact me privately or post anonymously to the comments section if the full story is not being covered.
A Second Chance for Hosanna Church
UPDATE: November 16, 2006
First Trial Scheduled for August, 2007
September 29, 2006 - Resignations in the Sheriff's Department
March 5, 2006
Hosanna May Reach Trial in '06 (2theadvocate.com)
January 23, 2006
Coverup Continues
December 19, 2005.
DA: Hosanna trial priority
Hosanna Coverup (part 1)
Hosanna Coverup (part 2)
Hosanna Coverup (part 3)
Hosanna Coverup (part 4)
Hosanna Church Update - The Evidence Emerges
Hosanna Church Update -- Charges Put on Hold (Monday, September 19, 2005)
DA to Seek New Indictments in Hosanna Church Sex Case (Thursday, September 15, 2005)
Hosanna Church Cult and "Brainwashing"
Community-based Ritual Abuse and the Hosanna Church Cult
Related:
Is "Brother" Mike DePhillips "Detective" Mike DePhillips?
Hosanna Coverup, the DA, and Sadie Henderson
Rick A. Ross Institute's collection of related links
Rigorous Intuition
UPDATE: Witness: Bernard Would 'Confess': Ex-Churchmember Says He Also Recanted (Dec. 1, 2007) (2theadvocate)
UPDATES: Detectives Pray, Quote Scripture During Hosanna Case Interrogations (Nov. 30, 2007) (2theadvocate); Witnesses Deny Abuse at Hosanna Church (Dec. 2, 2007) (2theadvocate)
UPDATE: FBI Agent Testifies in Hosanna Trial (Nov. 29, 2007) (2theadvocate)
UPDATE: Child's Nightmares Launched Case (Nov. 29, 2007) (2theadvocate)
UPDATE: First Witness in Hosanna Church Case to Take the Stand (Nov. 28, 2007) (2theadvocate.com)
UPDATE: Jury Selection in Austin "Trey" Bernard's trial
Jury Selection Starts for Church Member Accused of Child Rape (KATC3)
UPDATE: August 15, 2007
Defense: Witnesses Recant (2theadvocate.com)
UPDATE: May 10, 2007
Attorney Gets Copy of Hosanna Suspect's Confession (2theadvocate.com)
UPDATE: December 23, 2006
I know some of my sources have spoken about shady dealings in regards to the church property. As always, feel free to contact me privately or post anonymously to the comments section if the full story is not being covered.
A Second Chance for Hosanna Church
UPDATE: November 16, 2006
First Trial Scheduled for August, 2007
September 29, 2006 - Resignations in the Sheriff's Department
March 5, 2006
Hosanna May Reach Trial in '06 (2theadvocate.com)
January 23, 2006
Coverup Continues
December 19, 2005.
DA: Hosanna trial priority
Hosanna Coverup (part 1)
Hosanna Coverup (part 2)
Hosanna Coverup (part 3)
Hosanna Coverup (part 4)
Hosanna Church Update - The Evidence Emerges
Hosanna Church Update -- Charges Put on Hold (Monday, September 19, 2005)
DA to Seek New Indictments in Hosanna Church Sex Case (Thursday, September 15, 2005)
Hosanna Church Cult and "Brainwashing"
Community-based Ritual Abuse and the Hosanna Church Cult
Related:
Is "Brother" Mike DePhillips "Detective" Mike DePhillips?
Hosanna Coverup, the DA, and Sadie Henderson
Rick A. Ross Institute's collection of related links
Rigorous Intuition
Labels: coverup, cult, hosanna, hosanna church, ritual abuse
posted by Professor Pan at 3:28 PM
125 Comments:
FaPMi'm just looking for the most recent update info on the Hosanna Coverup? Chris Labatt had fellow workers from his department following and harassing Ms. Mowbray, Ms. Bernard and the minor Bernard girl and making delberate acts against their property (loosening lugnuts on wheels, sitting in driveway for prolonged periods of time in work vehicles) making verbal threats against their lives, etc...before the ladies were able to leave the state? It's been made known to the authorities - who's the higher up's channeling all the coverups?
There are individuals from the Prosecutor's office, several in position within the local court system, obviously in the Sheriff's Dept but also in most of the other local departments including the FBI in New Orleans who are connected with this issue. Fact is, it is generally known and kept under "covers" that if anyone is/was born & raised in this area of Louisianna that - that person as well was abused sexually by several family members, family friends, etc... including same sex, and as well abused others within their reach - siblings, neighbor kids, cousins. It is simply known and accepted as acceptable. NO ONE IN THIS AREA WANTS ANY INFORMATION REGARDING THIS CASE TO GET OUT BECAUSE EVERY LAST PERSON INVOLVED IN INVESTIGATING, IF FROM THIS AREA, IS EQUALLY GUILTY AND MOST PROBABLY HAS HAD PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AND POSSIBLY CONNECTIONS WITH THIS VERY CASE THEMSELVES. WHETHER HELPING COVER UP AND KEEP THEIR "LOVERS" SAFE FROM HARM OR SIMPLY COVERING THEIR OWN BACK SIDES.
Why aren't the bigger networks, reporting agencies, etc....biting at this - I just don't get it - do they get shut down or do they not see the bigger picture?
Thanks, anonymous. See my reply here:
http://www.charm.net/~profpan/2006/01/hosanna-church-coverup-continues.html
What is being said about the 1st pastor Lamonica who was pastor for several years before his son took over? He had repeatedly had "youth group" girls in his office sitting on his lap, etc... It is known and accepted that he and his wife sexually molested his "pastor" son and his other children. Mr. and Mrs. Al Pierson were both molested as children by parents, aunts, uncles and likewise molested their own siblings/cousins. Paul Fontenot was molested at least by his father, mother, and older brother and he as well abused the children now being interviewed in the present matter. Many, many, many Parents in this section of our country intimately bath their young children from birth on. Little Ms. Bernard was abused by her father and Pastor Lamonica (at least these 2 men) horrifically and regularly while her mother was at work for the 1st 2 - 3 weeks of her life. She ended up in the hospital, and although the nurse noted that her problems are related to sexual abuse, the doctor NEVER mentioned it to the parents. Wonder who had him in their pocket? It was not until Mr. Bernard & Mr. Lamonica were going through counseling with Ms. Mowbray, and both separately began revealing identical details in the same time frame and relating to a young child of new birth the same agre as little Ms. Bernard, that Ms. Mowbray suggested that Nicole Bernard request a copy of the medical file of her daughter from that first hospitalization that she found the nurses notation of sexual abuse.
Doesn't Geraldo Rivera investigate these type of matters. Is there any way to reach/contact him and ask him if he would investigage this particular Ponchatoula, LA situation?
Quote "Paul Fontenot was molested at least by his father, mother, and older brother"
Okay, now I'm pissed! Now I know who this poster is and this is the same mind control tacticts used to manipulate the victims in this situation to turn them away from the family who truly looved them and would have done anything to help them in this awful situation had we known about it! Because of your "visions" you managed to seperate them from us. How dare you say such things about genually good people? The Fontenot family has been through so much in the past year and for you to post such smut is appauling!!!!!!
Why is it that no mention of Mrs. Mowbray's involvement with the church is mentioned in any of the other posts? Anyone else notice that?
Actually - I'm quite sure I am not who you think I am to start with. And my information has come straight from Paul Fontenot's immediate family members. So, I have to ask what is your involvement with this situation and exactly what knowledge do you have that you are afraid of being exposed and what have you yourself been involved with as either victime or aggressor and how many others are you aware of - I know childhood friends confied with friends - don't play hide and seek and bullshit games with me.
And as far as Lois Mowbray - she was maticuliously set up to take the fall and I have personally viewed the video tapes that are in FBI custody, where both pastors Lamonica admitted to setting up the Mowbrays to take the fall for them. Would you be surprised to know Mr. Lamonica was smiling and almost laughing during his repeated admission!
I DO NOT play bullshit games, nor do I post false accusations against family members. Rest assured I am neither an aggressor nor am I a victim. Are you disappointed? Finger pointing seems to be your forte, and I'm afraid your finger will have to pont in another direction. I'll let you decided where.
I have no doubt that serious evil was done against the children involved in this case. I am here strictly in defense of the parents and the older siblings of Paul Fontenot. Stick to the facts in the case and leave this family alone.
hey all.....I just want to comment on the past few blogs written here about Paul Fontenot and his family. I know that Paul Fontenot is living at home with his family and visiting other family members regularly. If he was molested (as some say who evidently do not know shit) why is he there? I will tell you. Paul Fontenot was kept from his family (as well as many others) by Lois Mowbray. When he was arrested his family was the ones who showed up to help and defend him. His sister (who is in very tight with Lois and her family)and Lois were not the ones who came to help as they claimed they would. The Fontenot family does not talk to Nicole Bernard or Lois mowbray for the things they have done over the years to divide a very decent family. Mr. Fontenot has never claimed that his family has done anything to him. He was told by Mrs. Mowbray that they had and he was also made to agree to terms stated by her under fear and intimidation. Mrs. Mowbray is the lady who is responsible for destroying multiple families in the community for years. Now that is something that is true. Why aren't the officials investigating a woman in which multiple fingers point to?
The person who wrote that Lois Mowbray seems to be left out of everything is absolutely correct. I am not the only one who knows that Lois and Jesse Mowbray had certificates of Ministry and were the pastors of Hosanna during the time of said abuse, not the Lamonicas. Yes, I said it. Lois Mowbray was the Pastor and the Lamonicas submitted to her. However, Mrs. Mowbray has tried to cover up this and many other facts. And I'm sorry to burst everyone's bubble, but there was never a satanic cult, there was never any child abuse at the church, there were no sacrifices, or drinking blood, Deputy Labat never had any fellow workers follow anyone. He also never made any verbal threats, never sat in anyone's driveway "spying" on them. Why couldn't the ladies leave the state. All of them had cars. It's real easy, you get in, and you leave. Why did they stay so long? Because they needed that time to make up evidence against the Lamonicas, Fontenot, Labat...and the rest of the accused. If anyone would bother to attend the court hearings, you will see for a FACT that ALL of the physical "evidence" has turned out to be made up. It has been a set-up from the beginning.THE ONLY COVER-UP IS THIS: Lois Mowbray demanded the Lamonicas give her the church and property because "God" said so(a $3 million piece of property) , Nicole Bernard was wanted for Tax evasion, but was told by Lois that if she got her husband out of the way she could pin it all on him (what better way than to say the he molested his daughter), and STEPHEN BROWN (who has helped Mowbray and Bernard from the beginning) who told the investigators that he knew nothing of the events even though he lived in the same home of the Bernards during the time of said abuse. So Mr. Brown had to tell the truth to the police. However, Mr. Brown has claimed that he worked undercover for the FBI and knows for a fact that everyone is guilty except for Ms. Mowbray and Ms. Bernard,(why just these two people) because he has seen the evidence(the evidence that was later found to NOT EXIST according to the lead detective in the case) Mr. Brown has told many people in the community that the accused are guilty. Did anyone know that Stephen Brown attempted to join the Reserve Division of the Tangipahoa parish Sheriff's Office? And that he was soon kicked out because he was playing with his loaded gun and pointed it to someones head? Mr. Brown believes that Deputy Labat was the one who got him kicked out. Mr. Brown has told others that he had a vendetta against Deputy Labat since that time. Mr. Brown aided Mowbray and Bernard in setting up the others. At the time of the arrests, Brown was still an active member of the church, however, many of the accused had already left because of the tyranny of Lois Mowbray. Why was he not arrested also? That doesn't make much sense. I have much much more inside information that I will soon share. Only because I am so disgusted at the false accusations being aimed at those involved. I don't care if I am the only one who speaks out. Yes, I attended the Church, Yes, I knew these people very well. I want the people to know the truth. Feel free to email me at voice4theinnocent@hotmail.com
Wow, I'm glad to see more people posting on this subject. I thought all the facts were out but it seems like this thing is even more of a conspiracy than before. I haven't found any new articles on it but I'll post if I do.
Geez, do those first posters even have a comeback, or did the truth just come out?
LETS HAVE SOME TRUE FACTS...!!!
NOT JUST HEAR SAY/
Nothing but the truth from voice4theinnocent. No hearsay here.
time and patience will uncover the real truth in the hosanna church scandal.
the person and people who have sinned against their maker will be brought to justice in time.
many familes have been hurt by the "quote" profitess of this church who has done her best to excomunnicate any and all who would not follow her the way she wanted them to. i ask for all members who were hurt or led wrong by her to come forward to the district attorney in helping bring this woman to justice.
all of you who were in a church of hundreds and taken to it's knees to just a handfull to come forward with any thing that could help the tangiaphoa "7" as only lamonica and bernard have confessed to any trangressions to police.
bring the "3" people to justice before they lie and hurt 7 people and their families.
remember if you believe in god judgement day will come for the innocent and the guilty in this case and eternity in heaven or hell waits for you.
Labat and his sheriff dept. buddies that seem to somehow mysteriously elude any confrontation/responsibility, ganged up on Mr. Brown and set him up - funny Labat's friends were the one's making the "accusations". I do not know if his "friends" were aware of what the situation actually was - maybe they thought they were helping defend a truely needy situation - however - they were stalking and harassing the innocent while the monster sat right beside them. I watched little Ms. Bernard as she went through a photo album and identify picture by picture and page by page the faces that hurt her, and tell what was done to her. She knew them by their lawful names as well as by their pretend names that they gave themselves. The people remaining in jail + Al Pierson used little Ms. Bernards dog against her - her pet - they would put peanut butter on her body and let the dog remove it. That is nothing compared to what the animals know they have done in regard to tying and taping this child up - stuffing her mouth so no one would hear her screams. The things they put inside her little body including stick pins to draw blood for their "cultish activities that never happened".
There is a cover up going on here - Mr. Perilloux(sp?) a friend of Angie Lamonica and the entire Lamonica family - could offer some valuable information.
Those remaining in jail and Mr. Pierson, were careful to protect themselves. The reason the ladies did not leave, as I believe I said earlier, They were being stalked by Mr. Labat and his Sheriff Dept. friends, other stalkers were follow the Mowbray's and Ms. Bernard throughout town. Numerous threats regarding these people being killed should they try to seek outside help. That is why the ladies left at night and drove straight to Florida and contacted a police department there. Why go straight to the police and recruit them in such a situation if they were so guilty. You have heard of people fleeing for their lives? - This was such a situation. Except, no one wants this information to come out - no one. The Mowbrays as I said were maticulously set up as scapegoats. Little Abigail would not have been so open and free if whe were afraid when she was with her mom and Ms. Mowbray. She ran and laughed and played with other children, although at first very hesitant of little boys because of the hurt caused to her.
I keep referring to little Ms. Bernard - I do realize that 2 other children are involved here and are just as important and effected as little Ms. Bernard. Louis Lamonica held a gun to his own childrens heads and made them perform sexual acts against each other - other men and women and little Ms. Bernard, all those in jail were involved in this - these boys were so young when this started and they have lived their lives in fear. God is a soverign God and He reigns - better that a millstone be placed around ones neck and cast into the sea than to harm one of God's little ones.
I believe that during the preliminary hearings for all those in jail revealed that the so called attempt by Ms Bernard and Mowbray to contact the Pensacola Police never happenned. The Pensecola Police do not even recall Ms Bernards name. It's very funny that they claim this attempt. The lead detective already spoke of this on the stand when questioned under oath...
Okay, now I have to speak my piece. I'm a Sgt. with the Tangipahoa Parish Sheriff's Office. I worked with deputy labat. I'd lose my job if the sheriff knew I was speaking against for the office.it was found that after extensive investigation and interviews of many, many deputies, that there is no truth whatsoever to the claim that deputy labat followed/threatened mowbray or bernard or have any co-workers do it for him. 3/4 of the department was investigated also by the FBI. Prior to the arrest of everyone, the FBI followed mowbray and bernard as well as the others. Maybe they thought it was labat or the TPSO. But none of the above has unmarked black suburbans. Stephen Brown was not set-up by labat or "buddies". Stephen Brown was a volunteer fireman. brought his gun up to the firestation, and pointed it to one of the fireman's head!!! All of the firemen present were a witness to this. The firemen were the ones who filed the complaint against Stephen Brown!! Not labat. he wasn't even present at the time that brown did this stupid act. I'm glad he got kicked out of the reserve academy because I'd never let him work on my shift, with my men. You are so ignorant. Do you really think that the sheriff is covering for labat?? He had labat thrown in solitary confinement for several months. I was there. I saw him when I brought people to the jail. Believe me, he got no special favors. The sheriff is covering nothing. All these people yelling that there is a cover-up are ignorant. I also spoke with a bailiff from the court preceedings. He said that according to the detective on the case, no record of mowbray or bernard "seeking help for their lives" exists. Believe me, if someone makes such a report, it is documented extremely well. I don't know the other people involved but I'd say that the mowbray lady is a nutcase and is behind this whole thing.
Thanks so much for posting this. It's not a big story, but it's important. I've commented on this case and other outbreaks of Satanic panic/real religious crime on my blog, The Devil Appears.
To me, the Hosanna case is about child sex abuse, period. These people are no more Satanists than I am a pterodactyl. They're just a buncha pervs using the most cliched defense in the world. Having grown up in a tiny, isolated town full of "devout" evangelicals/Baptists, not unlike Ponchatoula but in the North, I know that these sicknesses can spread like wildfire.
I myself made the Pensacola contact for the ladies as they fled LA - so when I tell you that to say it did not happen - is simply saying that someone in authority is covering up evidence - it's true. Contacts were made to Washington DC as well. Records of this contact being made is as simple as subpoening cell phone records from various - any halfwit in any position of authority - attorney, prosecutor, judge, etc.... could do this - Why aren't they. It takes a subpoena to get records over 6 months back and it takes a subpoena to do so and only certain people have the authority to issue these - again - why are not they? What personal exposure could this situation lead to for them?
Well Let's see what common sense tells you.....So far none of these cases have been brought to court because lack of evidence. The TPSO doesn't want to look stupid. I know for a fact someone from the accused has written on this board. I want to know though if this case was so big at the begginning what happened to the media coverage? Don't tell me that Ponchatoula is trying to avoid Negative media...this is too big to ignore.
Re: Anonymous 12:16 p.m. - is the lead detective covering up, lying, or simply the wrong person to be asking. What connections/interests does the does the detective have
Re: Anonymous 12:16 p.m. - is the lead detective covering up, lying, or simply the wrong person to be asking. What connections/interests does the does the detective have
I have some comments I would like to make about Stephen Brown and Lois Mowbray. I know for a fact that Stephen Brown is guilty and a homosexual and acted out his homosexual fantasies on the two young boys. Even to the point of holding down the youngest one while he raped him. I have spoken to the youngest boy myself and heard it from his own mouth that Stephen Brown raped him. Why aren't the police investigating this further?? Both boys said that the police arrested the wrong people. The police found pictures of Stephen Brown at Lois Mowbray's home, laying on the couch laughing while holding a plunger up his anus while a dog licked his testicles. Isn't this a matter that should be looked into further?? If Stephen Brown and Lois Mowbray are that demented to do things like that, I could see why they tried to turn everything on everyone else.
It seems as though no one is posting anymore. I have some pictures of Stephen Brown and the interior of the Hosanna church. Would anyone even be interested in seeing this? Leave a post on here.
Please use this space to post updates or any information you'd like to share.
I think the posts have quieted down because everyone is waiting for the trial.
Anyone who has information they'd like to keep private can email me directly, or request my post office box address.
Yes I would like to see pics!!
I will try to post the pictures on a site like angelfire.com but can email them for now. Let us correspond by email. Voice4theinnocent@hotmail.com
To: Chris Labat, Paul Fontenot and Monty Fontenot. Chris and Paul YOU know that you are GUILTY for Raping children and worship Satan. I understand that you MUST do everything in your power to take the focus off of you and your horrific actions that you have done against these children. You do this by attacking, twisting, lying, and manipulateing everything one the innocent individuals of the situation. Chris and Paul if you are innocent like you say you are, then why has the TPSO not removed your ankle bracelets to show and prove you are innocent. Chris why has your parents got the most shady lawyer that they find to defend you? Lets have a reality moment and cut throught all of the crap. The bottom line is that when your court day comes Paul you will become a bitch of the prison and Chris ,well, we all know what happens to child rapest in prison and not to mention that you are a FORMER COP. You are a dead Man! Monty, you are a nobody and the sad part is that you think you are something and somebody in the community. However, the people in the community and North Lake Christian Academy know what you are and they have no respect for your unfair treatmen of the student body and know that you are a coward. You think that you have all the right connections in the community, However, you are not the only person that has connections. You see the problem is this, you use these people all the time for you personal gain and to boost your self esteem. You need to point the blame to someone else because you cannot have your family name dishonored, when in reality your family had no honor to begin with. Paul has the look of guilt and fear written all over him. His guilt is not from doing what he did but from being caught. He is scared to death and everybody who knows him and is around him can see it.
And Mr. Labat what is the deal with Mr. Brown and your smear campaine againt him. That you need to attack him from all sides. Is he that much of a threat to you and your group of sick twisted and defiled perverts. It's time for a Reality check- he was not the one arrested- YOU WERE. Also please explaine to the world why you were charged with who know how many counts of child pronography on you personal computer and your assigned duty computer. HOOOO I know the Porno faries just stopped by to try and frame you. Do you honestly think that people are stupit and cannot figure this out for ourself. YOU CANNOT CON EVERYBODY ANYMORE!
Anonymous: FOR NOW!
Oh, by the way, Voice4theinnocent@hotmail.com. I know who you are and what a joke you are. YOU SUCK and I hope you enjoy get what you deserve in prison.
One of the Anonymous posters asks the question "Why aren't the officials investigating a woman in which multiple fingers point to"? Let me answer this question with the facts in its entirety. First you need to ask the question " Whose multiple fingers are doing the pointing"? Are they individuals that are outside of the case that are supporting the same things statements that the accused are saying or are they the accused. If the only people that are pointing their "multiple fingers" are those that have been charged; then they are discredited. Next during the investigation and the interviews are the statements of the accused the same. Personally, I would not think so. This is too big of a case; with too many people involved to have every story correlated together and I would think not. Now to answer the question asked before. The officials DID investigating her just as they did with everyone else and they found nothing that supported the claims of the guilty. How do I know this? I made a phone call. However, all of the others were indited by a Grand Jury, this is a known fact. Now I must ask the question. Why? If all of these individuals are innocent like they claim. Then what evidence does the officials have that would cause a grand jury to indite all of them but the two women that supposedly brought this to light?
I have been keeping up also with this case and with all of the information that is out there. I can see these people threaten those that "blew the whistle" on the matter. Even here in the Mid-West, it is well known how things work in the South, especially in what is considered the Deep South. There is the Good O'L Boy politics and we all know that the mentality is like Vegas: What happens in the Deep South stays in the Deep South. America knows how corrupt the Deep South is (Especially Louisiana) Point-n-Case. Several years ago it was reported on 20/20 about a county/parish that was rewarding their officers for confiscating cars, jewelry and anything of value from the citizens and passer thorough for minor violations. Now I do know if this is still in effect but I do know that it was going on back then. In the local newspaper about 3 months ago. The local prison system "lost" approximately $50,000 of the inmates’ money. Yes, I said, "LOST"! Not my words but the papers editors. Now my opinion, $50,000 just does not disappear. There are paper trails and even electronic paper trails. So I am still trying to wrap that concept around my brain.
I too would like to see the pictures that Voice4theinnocent@hotmail.com claims they have.
I have a question for Anonymous that made the statement "And I'm sorry to burst everyone's bubble, but there was never a satanic cult, there was never any child abuse at the church, there were no sacrifices, or drinking blood,..." How can you make a completely ridiculous statement? IF none of this happened as you say then where did the evidence come from that the investigating and grand jury used to indite the lot. I know for a fact the Grand Juries do not indite individuals on serious charges like these because somebody makes an accusation. There must be some evidence of some sort to support their decision. Also where you there when all of this supposedly happened? If not then you have no grounds to make statements like you did and if you were then you should be investigated as well or perhaps you were and have an ulterior motive for making a comment like that. It makes me wonder about your intent. Especially, if a Nurse noted in her medical chart that there was sexual abuse. Please explain your though on that. Again it makes me wonder about your intent. You also state that "you will see for a FACT that ALL of the physical "evidence" has turned out to be made up." Explain this to me. Why would the DAs office and head Investigative officer let it be known that they have a semi-truck trailer full of evidence- what is in it, I do not know; but a semi-truck load if it was all fake.
Another Anonymous stated "THE ONLY COVER-UP IS THIS: Lois Mowbray demanded the Lamonicas give her the church and property because "God" said so(a $3 million piece of property)" How could Lois Mowbray demand something that I am sure she knew was not the Lamonicas to begin with. I believe that the church was originally an Assembly of God and when Hosanna became defunct the Assembly of God came in a claimed their property. Now if the Lamonicas did own the said property and if Mrs. Mowbray was controlling everybody with MIND control, as they want everyone to believe then the property would be in her name. This would be public information and guess what after some research and phone calls, it was not in Mrs. Mowbray's name it was in Mrs. Lamonicas name. So your theory of a "true cover up" does not have a leg to stand on.
Oh Crap! Here we go again with another bum ass comment. Anonymous states "I know for a fact that Stephen Brown is guilty and a homosexual and acted out his homosexual fantasies on the two young boys. Even to the point of holding down the youngest one while he raped him. I have spoken to the youngest boy myself and heard it from his own mouth that Stephen Brown raped him. Why aren't the police investigating this further?? Well first let me state that if you truly knew it was a fact then you would be an accessory to the crime and/or a participant. Secondly, if you are making this "factual statement" based on talking to the youngest boy then it is not fact but hearsay. So what is it hearsay or were you there when he supposedly committed this heinous crime against the youngest boy? Either way you are guilt of being involved or full of crap- you take your pick because I have my opinion. Thirdly to answer your question "Why aren't the police investigating this further"?? What is there to investigate when it was reported by the paper that both of Lamonicas boys recanted their story several different times. They have no integrity regarding this matter. They have proven to be liars and un-trust worthy.
So just ponder on the things. The truth will be revealed sooner or later.
Oh- one more thing I am getting gitty with excitement because the truth will come out and prove my research based suspisions.
I think it is HILARIOUS how STEPHEN BROWN, composer of the first paragraph, waited so long to respond to the previous paragraph. Was it because he had to wait and see what his beloved Nicole Bernard would say? Or, perhaps wait on his master Lois Mowbry to get answers from her god about what to respond with? I think the latter is the best possible answer, since he so worships Mowbry. I am quoting Brown from a couple years back, when he described Mowbry as "..Dude, she's like Jesus..." What a dumbass! Stephen, in that last paragraph, I can see why you scored an 11 on the ACT. Next time, maybe get mommy to type the paragraph for you, but then again, I don't see where that would help either....
DAMN!!! Steve, you just got told. An 11 on the ACT? Don't they give you a 12 for spelling your name right? You gonna go pray to Lois Mowbray for a response? holla back :)
(SNAAAAAP)-- Chris and Paul did you hear and feel that. You fell for the trap and were stupid enough to fall for it. HAAAA, HAAAA-HAAAAA. What make you think that this is Steve?
people,
this bickering back and forth on the hosana church trial has got to stop before someone gets hurt from it all.
all of you just wait it out until the time comes for judgement is made. youse guys on both sides are supposed to be christians?????? what do you think god thinks of all of you.
it is what religion does to people look to the mideast it's been going on since the beginning of time. if youse guys believe in eternity you had better get your life right and be ready to meet your maker if you really believe in god duh!!!!! and please if your going to blog at least read over your writing because some of you are pretty illeriate.
people god dosen't sleep and you better get a relationship with him a.s.a.p. that's all i've gotta say to you stop talking about each other and wait for the trial and the truth to come out again i ask anyone who know's anything about this case to come forward to the D.A. and help it get to trial and finally finished.
mr. d.a. how about a persons right to a speedy trial do you know this if so get it going my man and finish all this for once and for all.
finally, someone with some common sense and integrity. this person has got his stuff together. let time, the system, and god decide the outcome. why so much hate? was anyone at this church full of love? oh well. let us have some respect for the creator of this website and quit filling it with trash. if you are mad at each other be adults and tell each other face to face and be honost. wait until all is over and then say something.
About a year and a half ago I had 3 visitors in my home and we made a memorable trip to WalMart, I came into the store after driving a van. I would REALLY like the one who received a long winter coat from a friend of mine - to look me up - I'm listed. Don't call, the phone is out right now - send a letter so we can get in contact. I only want to be a familiar shoulder and ear. I know how it feels to need one - for whatever reason. I myself have had overwhelming issues in my life - nothing like this - but I just want you to know and I think you do - that when God picks someone out of a crowd and lays them on your heart/mind repeatedly - it's for His purposes - not ours. I meant it when I said you were family - nothing has changed. My kids still ask where their cousin ________ is and when will they get to see her again. They ask if she is alright. Her fairytale book is still on the book shelf waiting for her. LYLAS - Me
To the person who posted before me like we cannot put 2 and 2 together to figure out who you are talking about! How dumb can you be???
Well I think you're pretty stupid that you would think "chris and paul" would write on here. I talked to Chris and he said that he hasn't been online in over a year, and could care less what you people say about him, because he KNOWS he is INNOCENT and happily awaits the day he can go to trial so that everyone will see that this was a setup of lois, nicole and stephen. And that "May God have mercy on the souls of the liars in this case". I happen to know you stephen, lois and nicole. And whether he wants me to or not, I speak on behalf of chris and the rest of the innocent. I hope you rot in hell :)
To the person who wrote "(SNAAAAAP)-- Chris and Paul did you hear and feel that. You fell for the trap and were stupid enough to fall for it. HAAAA, HAAAA-HAAAAA. What make you think that this is Steve?" I hope everyone sees this. Chris and Paul haven't even wrote on here yet people are still trying to set up traps for them. Stephen ,Lois and Nicole: we know this is you. nobody here is stupid. Haven't you spread enough lies about the innocent people in this case? why are you still trying to set up traps on here? The "trap" doesn't really even make much sense. Stephen, Lois and Nicole, I hope you understand the repercussions of the things you have done. God has prepared a special place in HELL for you liars. :)
Stand by all, new accurate information soon to follow. Lies only last for a moment, but truth remains forever. Truth never changes nor contradicts itself.
well, let's here it
still standing by for that "truth". Also, I wanted to add a comment to a statement made earlier on. Someone said that "Labatt had to get the shadiest lawyer in town" Actually his lawyer is very well respected and is not considered "shady" as you put it. Furthermore, I would imagine that if I were thrown in jail for crimes of this nature, and I knew I was innocent, I would get the first lawyer that I could. I'm sure he didn't shop around while he was in jail. Retard.
(voice4theinnocent@hotmail.com)
To the JACKASS above,
It is quite oblivious that you have your head stuck up your own ass so far that you cannot smell your own stink. Everybody knows that ALL lawyers are “shady” because they are trained to finding “Loop Holes” and manipulate the law to their clients benefit. Many criminals have been not convicted because of an attorney doing what he does best. So do not hand the world a big pile of crap and tell them it is a pile of roses. Lawyers that stand up for their clients and stand up for the law are a thing of the past and even then they were not all that great. So the above statement that you made makes you look like an unintelligent fool.
Hey dumb fuck,
You want some of this shit, Bitch? You are a fucking moron. A prosecuting district attorney is trained to find loop holes too. you dumb fucking retard. why don't you give your address to me so we can talk in person. I couldn't even begin to tell you how many people have been wrongly convicted and sent to jail for shit they didn't do just because the DISTRICT ATTORNEY was SHADY and like this case, other shady people like Lois Mowbray, Stephen Brown, and Nicole Bernard. Then, after the person has spent 10yrs in jail for some bullshit, we find out they were SET UP. Sounds like the hosanna case to me. Idiots like you should be shot on site just so that there are less stupid people in this world. Matter of fact, I'd volunteer to help that cause.
Since you are so intelligent, obviously you have already given room to the thought that maybe, just maybe, I know this is hard to believe, but could it be...Yes.
Believe it or not, a DISTRICT ATTORNEY will find loopholes to convict someone even though he believes he may be innocent. One of these upstanding DA's actually wrote a book on how a DA will manipulate the system to his favor in order to get a conviction even though the evidence clearly showed the person innocent. The name of the book is "I'm Gonna Bury You!".
So the poster you were referring to doesn't sound that unintelligent, actually. The district attorney knows how to find loopholes also. However, in this case, I believe they won't need to find any loopholes. I found news footage from June 2005 where the DA said that there was an enormous amount of evidence of the crimes being committed, including DNA, videos, pictures, etc... that he stated he would use to send the people away for life.
Again, we come back to what was actually found. The lead detective (who has now left the department)stated that none of those items were actually found, they were only told by Mowbray, Brown, and Bernard that the items would be found. I believe that the DA and Sheriff's Office actually acted on evidence that they believed existed, before it actually manifested. The court preceedings seem to maintain this theory. Usually, in a high profile case, the DA will soon after the arrest, present to the public some form of evidence to justify his actions. If you have been following this case closely, you will notice that he has not done this. Rather, it appears as though an attempt is being made to "sweep this case under the rug", and hope everyone forgets about it. I'll be waiting for your "intelligent" reply, sir/madam.
Did I touch a nerve??????
I agree with the person who posted the comment on the book. Doesn't sound like a "nerve" was touched. Just sounds like common sense to me.
In response to the person who apparently thinks thay know something about the case and how the truth will come out soon. I am beginning to think that this case is bullshit. I have studied into the case and have talked to people also. I have even talked with someone from the DA's office down there. Every suspect that goes to court continually keeps getting another court date months down the line. Some are actually scheduled to go a few months into next year. I know that Mr. Pan posted an article about the case maybe reaching trial in '06. Well, that is apparently not going to happen. The Assistant DA has said to people that no one is close to being set for trial "anytime soon" which were the words actually used. With all these resignations coming, evidence apparently not turning up as the sheriff had expected would, the FBI has backed out, no medical evidence, and even victims taking stories back on account that nothing really happened, I believe that this once glorious story has turned out to be just like all the rest of these types. People just trying to get back at other people. Well, I guess I will just sit back and wait for that supposed "truth that never contradicts itself" to magically appear out of the thin air. Until then, I will use the brain, that apparently not all have, to figure out that this case is a washout.
It's 11-11-06. What are the next upcoming Court Dates? What is the timeline here? Who has what going on within the Court system and when? When is the last of this supposed to be done with?
After reading the article that said Bernard is going to trial in August of '07, I noticed that the judge set the date even though the DA claims they are still sorting through an "unimaginable amount of evidence." If this were the case, the DA would show the judge what was left to go through, then the judge would grant him more time. The judge could hold of the trial for ten years if he wanted (since nobody has requested it now) Since none of the defendants have declared their right for a speedy trial, why would the judge set a court date if he/she knows the DA is not ready? This leads me to believe that the judge is getting impatient with not seeing any evidence even though it's now over a year and a half later since all the "evidence" was found. What does everyone else think? Whatever happened to the person who had the truth that we were standing by for?
"No man for any considerable period can wear one face to himself and another to the multitude, without finally getting bewildered as to which may be the true".
Nathaniel Hawthorn
The truth is near!
"Words - so innocent and powerless as they are, as standing in a dictionary, how potent for good and evil they become in the hands of one who knows how to combine them".
Nathaniel Hawthorne
The truth is near. We've been hearing that for so long now. From what I heard, the truth that's going to come out is not even close to the "truth" that Lois Mowbray, Nicole Bernard and Stephen Brown have concocted. Take heed, for where you tread (Lois, Nicole, and Stephen), in the grounds of your lies, deception and delusions, no seed that you sow, goes unreaped. Thus saith the Lord.
Where has everyone gone. I have heard many "crazy stories", as if those that we have already heard are not crazy enough. Is it true that all are now out of jail and carrying on with their "normal lives"? without being questioned or promised any circumstances for anything to come? Is the system going to "forget all that has gone on before now??? Will only the children be left with the scars and humiliation that they have lived and will continue to live with whether it was physical or mental abuse that they suffered from the hands of so called adults. If any one of the actions that the defendants were accused of were true or any of the rumors of those that were not indicted were true, who will pay for the sins of the adults in this situation and if so, when will the so called "truth" come out. Are we all waiting for the election to pass or are we waiting for everyone to just forget that families, friends, loved ones, etc have been irreparably hurt and will never know all that has come to pass at the hand of a few evil persons. Shame on the government, shame on the justice system and shame on the public that will allow this to happen...we should all be asking the question, "what is going on and when will it end?. I am confused and ashamed for us all. How can things of this nature just rise its ugly head and then be allowed to bury it in the sand...
When are people going to realize that this whole thing was a HOAX. It was fake. It was made up to get people out of the way, so that Lois Mowbray could obtain then sell the church for $3 million. You retards. The District Attorney just put in the newspaper yesterday that "NOT A SINGLE PIECE OF EVIDENCE WAS FOUND TO SUPPORT ANY OF THE ALLEGATIONS EVER MADE!!" Wake up people!! These children don't have any scars because nothing ever happened to them. You people are retarded. Quit harping on all that bull. Oh the children this, the children that. Whatever! Several innocent adults spent time in jail for crimes they never committed. THe children didn't get their names and pictures plastered on national news and in every newspaper in the country. The innocent adults did. They are the ones with the scars. Justice is sitting on her butt because their is nothing to judge. There is no evidence to support any claim, allegation, rumor, nothing. Not a single shred of evidence. The police, and the DA know that nothing happened to these children and are ready to let it go. So why can't you?
It it is all made up, why did some defendants confess?
Only two defendents "confessed" to allegations that weren't allegations until they "confessed" to it. There are too many actual cases to count that are recorded with Federal, State, and Local law enforcement agencies where the investigators used tactics to twist the defendents words around to sound like a confession, and other cases where after being interrogated for many hours, and succumbing to the mind manipulation tactics used, the defendent will say anything just to make the interrogation stop. I'm not making this up, this is factual information. Information that we know to be true and factual in this case is that all, and I repeat, all, confessions made by the defendants were later disproved by the actual evidence found. For example, the sacrificed animals, and evidence of satanic worship. Absolutely no evidence was found to support these confessions. Even the medical doctor who examined the "victims" said that what was claimed to have happened to the victims was impossible because there would be evidence of such abuse. And from what I understand, as quoted in previous posts, a nurse reported the baby to have been abused, but supposedly the doctor said that it was just a rash. Lois Mowbray told the mother, Nicole Bernard, that the doctor was trying to cover it up because he was also a child molester. You have to understand Mowbray's mentality. She believes that everyone from the Southern states was molested at one point in their lives. There are two problems with the poster's statement, 1. The examiner in this criminal case states the total opposite, that no abuse occurred and 2. This is the most disturbing part, at the time that Nicole Bernard and Lois Mowbray claimed the baby was abused, the husband, Austin Bernard was not living with Nicole and her baby and had no contact with the child. He was not living at the house, but was actually living at the church, but was not allowed by Nicole or Mowbray to go home. If Nicole and Mowbray believed so strongly that abuse occured, why didn't they report it to the police then. Why wait several years? What kind of mother would do that? After studying psychology and applying what I know to this case, I see a woman (Mowbray)that convinced people she was some sort of God leader or something and they would be struck down with lightning if they didn't follow what she said. But, unlike other cases that I've read about, there is no evidence that any criminal activity occured. So maybe Mowbray wasn't a Waco type leader, but more of the type that controlled people by making people believe that following the Bible exactly would result in them not making heaven or something like that. So, matched with the lack of evidence of any crime, and with this brief psychological insight, I'd say that molesting children and satanic worship would be at the opposite end of the spectrum of what these people believed. This group of people would be classified as "overly-strict adherers to the Bible".
Another interesting fact that I have stumbled upon is that Lois Mowbray is suspected of trying to obtain the church property (worth $3 million). Please bear with me while I expose this consipiracy. I want the police to answer this question, why were only the people that still attended that church arrested? This sounds superficial but is a very deep question. A number of other people attened the church at the time of said abuse. Why weren't they implicated? A number of other youths lived with Nicole and Austin at the time of said abuse. Why weren't these people arrested? Now for the part that gives credit to my questions: Those people were not in Lois Mowbray's way of obtaining the church. Only the people left attending the church were implicated by Nicole and Mowbray. Does anyone else see this? The others were not a threat to her operation. Statements from the court procedings state that these other people were interviewed but not arrested. According to the court transcripts, all and I again repeat, all of the people questioned stated that they did not believe any of the accused crimes had occured. These statements were out of the mouths of people who lived in the house of the victim at the time of the alleged crimes. This sounds like the Duke rape case to me. Does anyone else have more information?
I'm sorry it doesn't sound like the duke lacross team case. They were victims of malicious prosecution. In this case as you said there were no allegations before the confessions so your argument about coercion seems misplaced to me. The very fact that confessions set the ball rolling apparently made of free will at least by Lamonica. As far as the allegations of ritual abuse being disproved I that is debatable I think a more accurate assertion is that they have not been proven. It is known in trying cases on the basis of SRA is very risky for prosecutors for this reason they will avoid attacking cases on this front. The fact that no evidence has surfaced does not prove that the confessions were false it does put them in a dubious light. I think the actual trials if they ever happen will shed some light as to why the defendants were accused and what actual evidence exists against them.
I'm sorry, but you are incorrect. This is just like the Duke case with malicious prosecution. You are wrong about the confessions. Their confessions are not what got the ball rolling. Mobray and Nicole are what got the ball rolling. So yes, there were allegations before the confessions. Thats a cold hard fact. Check the court records before you make your own assumptions.
I find it hard to believe people like you just accept what you hear without using common sense. For example, you said" As far as the allegations of ritual abuse being disproved I that is debatable I think a more accurate assertion is that they have not been proven."
People like you are a disappointment to the human race. If we looked at any case like you are suggesting, then you leave no room for the fact that people lie and make things up. So I could say that in addition to satanic rituals, the suspects were also involved in the JFK assasinatin. Well, allegations were made but no evidence was found to support the allegations. According to your view, sufficient evidence equals guilt, and NO evidence found also equals some amount of guilt. That's retarded. I say that given the severity of allegations made, the FACT that NO evidence was found tips the scale to the suspects innocence, and tips the scale out of the favor of those who made the allegations. I want to let you know that I go to the court preceedings, I have followed this from the beginning. Unless there is evidence being withheld which is illegal, not one shred of evidence has been presented to the court to tip the scales of justice proving guilt. A reasonable person would have to begin to assume the allegations were false.
According to the news releases, there should be no reason the DA would avoind attacking the case on the SRA front. The only problem is that in the news releases, the DA and Sheriff stated that they had found evidence that had not actually been found yet. They were only told that it would be there. This is why everyone thinks it's a coverup. People ask "what happened to all the evidence that was found, now they say there isn't any evidence?" It's not that they are covering up the evidence, it's that the evidence was never found. That is why they are backpeddling.
I'm not sure where you live, but I encourage you to go to the court preceedings. See for yourself when the detectives and the DA say to the judge (and I quote perfectly)" well your honor, we haven't exactly found any evidence yet that would benefit the prosecution..." Are you telling me that with local, state and federal law enforcement agencies scouring the church, homes and every posession of the accused, that not even a single shred of evidence was found. I'm sorry, but if everying that was said to have happened did, they would have found something by now.
There are some more court preceedings in August. I'll report the events back on here.
It's official. The two boys are saying the whole thing was made up. So let's see...we started off with 100 victims, then only had 24, then only 3, but now only one ( who was 0-2 at the time but somehow remembers every single detail of the events) now Nicole Bernard is holding onto the assumption her child was molested also. Even though 99 other people have now said that nothing happened!! She's retarded. The only reason she still believes it is because Lois Mowbray thinks she hears from God and is telling Nicole that God said it happened. So we have 99 people, and 2 of the core 3 that are saying the whole thing was made up, and no physical evidence to support any allegation made up to this point.Nicole Bernard, you are a fool, and you are easily misled. Listen to common sense for once, instead of Lois Mowbray. Here is a link to the story. http://www.wwltv.com/local/northshore/stories/wwl081507khchurchabuse.37ae5b4f.html
http://www.wwltv.com/local/northshore/stories/wwl081507khchurchabuse.37ae5b4f.html
This link is having trouble, so anyone who is interested, just go to wwltv.com and in the search box, type in "hosanna"
First of all, the 2 boy victims are now actually grown over the age of 18 years old. They recanted their stories ONLY AFTER being placed in the home of their paternal grandmother who also was the founder of the original Hosanna Church. The 2 'boys' told their accounts of the abuse to countless medical practioners, social workers, and law enforcement agents (including the FBI which is a crime to lie to them). They also recanted PRIOR TO THAT'S BEFORE ALL 7 DEFENDANTS WERE INDITED BY THE GRAND JURY. Also, I have worked on this case and know that their stories are the same throughout the many detectives and other people mentioned above questioning them time and time again. Only the truth stands and does not change; differently as to when someone who is being questioned and if they are lieing their stories fall apart with different interigators and over time. The 3 victims stories also are EXACTLY THE SAME AS THE CONFESSIONS OF THE 7 DEFENDANTS. So did the 2 so called boys, now men recant because of family pressure??? Use your brain, of course they did, the family was so humiliated as suppose to have been this religous/highly respected family in the small community that they so called recanted to try and save face. Little late-don't you think? To many defendants confessions and the 'little' girl's, who also was a victim, story also matched. The little girl's story never changed over time even when her mother was arrested and she was alone in foster care for a whole year. HER STORY NEVER THAT RIGHT NEVER CHANGED. Her mother nor anyone was near her to make her stick to the same story-she just did on her own BECAUSE IT WAS AND STILL IS THE TRUTH.
So I, a independant thinker, would really carefully evaluate that the plot you are so desperately trying to portray is full of holes. Now again, you constantly want others to believe that Nicole Bernard and Lois Mowbray are so evil and made this whole thing up. Yet they were the ones talking constantly to authorities in 3 states to get help. They were arrested, yet never charged nor indited. They also are the ones who are completely free and living their lives outside of Louisiana. Yet they still continue to fight for the truth and justice. Not only for the 7 to be brought into accountability: Austin 'Trey' Bernard, Paul Fontenot, Louis Lamonica, the minister, Robbin Lamonica, Allen Pierson, Patricia 'Trish' Pierson and Christopher Labat, the police officer to be brought to justice, but they, Nicole Bernard and Lois Mowbray continue to make sure the District Attorney's office is doing their jobs the right way. So that no one can slip bribes under the table in exchange for their charges being dropped. I have heard these ladies calls for over view because of the corruption in the politcal, judicial, and Tangipahoa parish sheriff's office. Anyone from around these parts knows this corruption to be true. Like the old saying "What happens in Louisiana-stays in Louisiana." Multiple detectives who were involved in the Hosanna investigation have left the force shortly thereafter. Why is that? Because of the corruption.
So your theory that you are so desperately trying to make others believe about the 7 of you being so innocent just doesn't fly with me. So why would Nicole Bernard continue to fight so dilengently today for justice for her daughter if the whole thing is made up. She gets no media attention, no money NOTHING, but because it's the right thing to do so no other children are hurt like her daughter was treated. Even animals take care of their children better than these monster 7 defendants have done to children.
Media only report what sells which is not always the truth. A lie can always be embelished and sell. The media quotes only the defense attorneys which we know will say or do anything to get their clients off. Seems that not to long ago Reggie MacIntyre, Paul Fontenot's attorney, made a complete fool of himself on the Sunday Daily Star of how innoncent his client is and that their are no victims. The next day the Daily Star recanted and communicated the exact opposite spoken by the District Attorney's office. You are such a fool to quote a defense attorney as your main source of information when they are not out for the truth but to do anything for their clients. Another example: Look at the idiot, Michael Thiel, Louis Lamonica's attorney who said the whole thing was a hoax to the media at the beginning of the investigation. Too many victims with the same story. Too many defendants' confessions which match exactly to the letter. I've unfortunately have been sickened to have read them.
The 7 defendants who were indited and still charged are not mentally ill. They all held respectable jobs in different fields. They are all just evil and sick. You, the above writter, are one of the 7 defendants. You work so hard to make people believe that this was all a lie when too many medical and different police authorities say differently. Yes that's right multiple people with degrees in different fields have all verified the 3 victims stories to be accurate. So I really don't think Lois Mowbray used mental telepathy to reach all these professionals to manipulate their thoughts are reports. Keep trying you fool and perhaps one day you might even convince yourself.
Yes, you say why did the 7 defendants confess. It is possible so that they could get a lighter sentence don't you think. No one who was innocent would ever, ever confess to such horrific crimes.
Someone did state above, that the actual trials will shed light to the evidence and the truth. So all your rambling doesn't even matter. Thus far the fact remains that their are still the same 7 defendants going to trial, and the 2 FALSELY ACCUSED, Nicole Bernard and Lois Mowbray, are released and free.
To the many people who read this forum, let me confidently say that the facts presented in the most recent, winded post are inaccurate. I encourage you to review the court records and compare this posters comments to the actual events. It is obvious that the poster is not up-to-date with the recent events and actual facts.
To the poster, at this time I believe that it would be best to allow you to continue on with this inaccurate, outdated information even though you claim it is neither.
Today is Monday, August 27,2007, please check back frequently for comments on this forum, because as it seems, this is our only way of communicating at this time. I'm sure there are others that will soon comment, and it may benefit you to hear what they have to say.